Loneliness is worse than any disease. We know this because when comparing two individuals who may have the same ailment with low survival estimates, it is more often than not, the one who has a support group of some kind who does so successfully. While disease and sickness may scare many of us, the death of those that we love can also create mental strain and emotional havoc within us which can be detrimental to our own wellbeing. If we have people around us, who love us, with whom we can relate, who will simply have conversation with us, then we are able to mourn and grieve as healthy as one possibly can, and quite frankly, keep from eliminating ourselves as well.
You must login to vote
So where does loneliness stem from? Why are there some that can go without speaking or seeing any other human being for weeks, possibly even months, and others go crazy if a day passes and they haven’t talked with anyone? Are some humans needier than others, or is the process of loneliness one in which some are better equipped through those everyday habits and rituals which stave off connections to people to begin with?
Regardless of why it is that people feel lonely, can it even be said that one only feels lonely when they are alone? If this isn’t the case, then what exactly qualifies as loneliness when the lonely individual in question is not physically alone?
You have probably heard people complain about their spouse, if they feel that they are locked in a loveless marriage. They speak of feeling lonely, often because their once significant other is working all the time, or is just doing other things that take away from the time that the couple once spent together. While these individuals still live in the same dwelling, and they may come together to eat the same meals, etc., one individual claims to be “lonely,” even though, clearly they are not “alone.” These individuals may begin to look outside this relationship for ways to keep themselves from feeling so lonely, and this is, paradoxically, how we may begin to define what loneliness is, under these circumstances.
Let’s assume for a second that this “lonely” individual is still faithful to their spouse, and has not simply sewed up their loneliness with intimacy from someone else. How then may they fill their lives to alleviate this loneliness? Conversation is key.
Conversation is the impetus of all human progress. As one mind and heart alone is not sufficient in changing the world, conversation comes into play. Even Einstein needed a book publisher, or a room to speak in---ways to transfer the knowledge in his own head, and every step along that path, he was most assuredly engaging in conversation. The question at hand is why he felt the need to do so? What was it about Einstein that made him want to share his thoughts with the world? What made him inevitably choose to do so, after recognizing his own wants, concerning the subject?
Conversation can cover every subject that affects us, while the substance of the conversation is always useful, the act of conversing is ever more so. If you are communicating with someone else, be it within each other’s physical presence, on the
telephone, texting, twittering, using instant message, etc., all of these modes of conversation satisfy the need to know that there is someone else in the world. More importantly, there is someone else in the world, and they have taken the time to speak with you.
Still, this doesn’t solve the question as to why some feel lonely even within the process of conversation itself. When one is telling another that they feel lonely, it must be said that they feel less lonely than they would if they were not doing so. The very fact that an individual who is sick may be even more so, if they have no one to tell, must factor into our consideration. There is the possibility of sympathy that comes in the exchange of difficult details about one’s life to another, and that may very well alleviate the loneliness that one felt prior to the exchange, however, it may not. The fail-safe method of conversational tactics when explaining one’s difficult details seems to be in the want of relating, which we are not all receptive to, and this is a risk factor in conversational etiquette of sorts.
For instance, if you have a relative that is not well, and this affects you greatly, you may feel the need to go outside yourself in an attempt to lessen the burden of sadness and loneliness that you feel when considering the inevitable loss of this person. In doing so, when conversing with another and telling them your particular difficult details, you find yourself trying to make them relate, or at least opening the conversation up to the possibility. Your conversational partner may in fact be able to relate to what you are speaking about, and in doing so, they may tangent off into a story about how they dealt with their own difficult details concerning the same subject matter. When this happens, the alleviation of loneliness and the sadness most often accompanying it can be tenfold.
Is there a line that one can overstep, where conversation for the sake which can healthily alleviate loneliness becomes conversation for the sake of validation? Do people speak to one another in a deceitful manner whereby the conversation at hand can really be a way of coming to terms with their own insecurities, and is this necessarily wrong? Does it cheapen the conversation, when the one being used understands the real reason that their input has been sought?
If we come back to our initial opening statement, that loneliness is worse than any disease, then we must understand that much like a disease, loneliness can spread. It can infect others, especially those who are listening, those who are trying their best to help the lonely individual in question. So, in conversation with those that we love, if we find ourselves falling into a pool of pity, is that when loneliness is most apparent to us? Is this really loneliness?
One submits that unless you are physically alone, you are never lonely. If there is another person present, you always have the possibility of stepping outside yourself and engaging in conversation. Those who believe that being lonely in such a context constitutes something of a comparable feeling to those that have been and are truly alone and subsequently, lonely, have never actually been alone. If they had, then they would not feel that being in the presence of another individual, with whom you can interact, and not being in such a situation is the same thing.