Lit.Org - a community for readers and writers Advanced Search

Average Rating

(0 votes)

You must login to vote

We have two major developments to bring you up to date on. The first development involves Amazon's Kindle 2 reading device and the second pertains to our freelance class-action settlement (a settlement entirely independent of the settlement in our lawsuit against Google). Please feel free to forward and post this message.
Amazon Reversal on Text to Speech on the Kindle 2

At the end of the business day on Friday, Amazon announced that it would allow publishers (and thereby many authors) to block text-to-speech audio functionality on a title-by-title basis for its Kindle 2 reading device.

This is a good first step. Amazon's Kindle 2 can convert text to audio through text-to-speech (TTS) software, making it a combination e-book reader and low-quality audiobook device. (The quality of the audio will improve, of course, as TTS software is refined.) Amazon's initial implementation of Kindle 2 would have added audio playback to your e-book regardless of whether Amazon had properly acquired audio rights. For most of you, Amazon's announcement means that it will now respect your contractual right to authorize (or not) the addition of computer-generated audio to your e-books sold for the Kindle. We will be sending recommendations to you shortly on your TTS audio rights.

One important consideration in those recommendations will be to ensure that visually impaired people have access to this technology. Book authors have traditionally authorized royalty-free copies in specialized formats intended for the visually impaired, and copyright law has long provided a means to distribute recordings to the blind. We can work this out.

Wall Street Journal on Amazon's announcement:
Freelance Class-Action Settlement Going to Supreme Court

We received excellent news in our freelance electronic database class action lawsuit this morning. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case and decide whether federal courts have jurisdiction over lawsuits involving unregistered works. (Unregistered works are copyright protected, under U.S. law, but have a lesser status than registered works.) The Supreme Court decides to hear only a handful of the many cases it is asked to consider each year, so we're encouraged by this decision. It keeps alive the possibility that the settlement agreement originally reached in 2005 will be upheld.

The freelance electronic database class-action settlement, valued at up to $18 million, was to resolve the copyright infringement claims of freelance writers against database companies, such as Dow Jones and the owners of Lexis-Nexis, that had made digital use of the writers' articles without permission. Plaintiffs and defendants had arrived at a settlement in 2005, which the Southern District Court of New York approved. The settlement was objected to and appealed by a group of freelance writers who thought it failed to allocate sufficient funds to authors of unregistered works.

On November 29, 2007, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, in a 2-1 decision, the district court's approval of the settlement. The appellate court ruled that the district court lacked jurisdiction over claims relating to unregistered freelance articles. Copyright registration is required to bring a suit for infringement, but since registration is viewed as a formality (comparable, many of us believe, to the requirement that one file a complaint in order to get into court), lawyers on both sides thought the settlement could resolve infringement claims for both registered and unregistered works.
In January 2008, we filed a motion to ask that all of the 2nd Circuit judges rehear our appeal. That motion was denied. In August 2008, class counsel filed a motion for review by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case in order to decide the following question: "Does 17 USC 411(a) restrict the subject matter jurisdiction of the federal courts over copyright infringement actions?" The case is Reed Elvesier, et al., v. Muchnick, et al. (08-203).

Please note that the freelance electronic database class action is a completely different lawsuit from the recently announced settlement of Authors Guild v. Google over the scanning of books. For more information about that settlement, which is pending final approval, please visit

We'll keep you updated on the outcome of the Supreme Court hearing.

Related Items


The following comments are for "More from the Authors Guild on authors' rights."
by OchaniLele

Amazon's Kindle 2...Ochani Lele
Yes, interesting goings on...just saw a push marketing for the new Kindle 2, and thought, holy cow, the price is still way out of reach for the average reader...until the Kindle 2 is available for under 60 bucks, I doubt there will be too many motivated buyers or enough fanatical readers to put over 300 bucks into the device, my opinion from my marketing experience in LA and how people spend, etc.---especially now in today's economy.

Still, it is important to know what is going on with this and you are keeping us all very well informed. Fascinating and the end result has very long term ramifications indeed. When in VA I worked at the Library for quite a long time before I moved out to the Stafford house, but yes there were and have always been books on tape or CD whatever now for the blind...not much more expensive than buying a single book, so why do they need to charge so much for this kindle and use the blind excuse to boot?

Thanks for this bit of newest update, hope the writing is coming along well for your upcoming publisher deadline.

With ALL love,

( Posted by: TheRealKarmaTseringLhamo [Member] On: March 9, 2009 )

Add Your Comment

You Must be a member to post comments and ratings. If you are NOT already a member, signup now it only takes a few seconds!

All Fields are required

Commenting Guidelines:
  • All comments must be about the writing. Non-related comments will be deleted.
  • Flaming, derogatory or messages attacking other members well be deleted.
  • Adult/Sexual comments or messages will be deleted.
  • All subjects MUST be PG. No cursing in subjects.
  • All comments must follow the sites posting guidelines.
The purpose of commenting on Lit.Org is to help writers improve their writing. Please post constructive feedback to help the author improve their work.