Lit.Org - a community for readers and writers Advanced Search

Average Rating

(1 votes)

RatingRated by

You must login to vote

Today, I thought I’d put down a few words on the so-called technique of creative writing. Really, this is rather difficult seeing as I have nothing to say on the matter. What I mean by this is that I refuse to pronounce rules and regulations. Furthermore, I won’t deal in absolutes. All I wish to do is impart some tips I’ve acquired through my long history of non-lucrative writing… much of which falls into the so-called category of “creative.”

When looking for inspiration, I’ve often found it useful to find something to respond to, often a central and venerated text. For instance, one of my own triumphs: “No More Gods” came from one too many classroom exposures to Paradise Lost. Often, it’s difficult to find the motivation to put pen to paper, often only to proclaim the obvious. But when one sees fallacies regarded as sacred text, the intelligent mind burns with fervor to sharply respond.

In this sense, I’ve been most fortunate. My “creative” writing has all been done in the first decade of the twenty-first century, a time when the highways of thought are clogged with rubbish and deceit. One need only look at the yellow national newspaper to see the same despicable scenarios portrayed in the same propagandic manner... as in the worst periods of history.

Sensing this sterilizing trend, many American artists, intellectuals, etc. have lashed out with bohemian rage. In response to prejudice against gays, Kurt Cobain kissed Kris Novocelic on stage; In response to lackey-ification of the press, Gary Trudeau has created brutal comic satire; In response to the insipid commercialism of the age, there was “Schindler’s List.”

And so the creative writer usually Responds to particular messages that he is receiving, and seeing others receive. He is also a mere individual, tied to his time, place, and personal foibles. This should not discourage him. Look at me: I often came to the keyboard dirt-poor and without any connections. But through fiery inspiration and determination, I created work of value and, should the cosmic die roll my way, it will last.

Rather than being ashamed of one’s limitations as an individual, I encourage my fellow writers to embrace them, to greet the day with a most observant eye. When writing, try to give the reader a sense of just Who is writing. Where are they? Is it sunny or snowing outside? Is their leg sore? Did they receive a bonus this month?

All these seemingly petty facts that make up a person and his scenario are vital to the enterprise of writing: For the reader will not be in the same conditions or suffer from the same limitations.

Moving on, I’d like to put in a word for revision. Often, the best writing is done in a creative fury. The blinds have been lifted from the writer’s eyes and with his pen, he is seeing. All this necessary excitement tends nonetheless to lessen one’s literary horse-sense: the savvy use of commas, precise words, paragraph breaks, etc. Usually, a piece of writing forged in the fire of inspiration... will need to be revised a couple times in a less inspired state.

In conclusion, I will attempt to impart a few practically inexpressible notions. Try to always remember that a single consciousness is very limited… and the writer is engaged in a constant struggle between the singleness of existence and the aspiration to affect civilization at large. Also, there is always more to the picture than meets the eye: A knowledge of history is perhaps the most important ingredient in wisdom.

Anyway, I have today said nothing whole or coherent. But I am sincere and hope these odd-shaped thoughts might fill a niche in your cosmic puzzle.

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complicated, and more violent. It takes a lot of courage... and a touch of brilliance to move things in the other direction."

- Albert Einstein

Related Items


The following comments are for "ON CREATIVE WRITING"
by drunkenmonkeymind

My tuppence

Just adding my tuppence .

It's very trite but I'll say it all the same ; there can be no substitutes for - an innate mastery over the language , a finely-honed aesthetic sense , and inspiration often a will-o'-the wisp-like quality .

Rules ,if any, are for the critics - and perhaps for the birds - who have little else to fall back on to carry out an ex-post facto dissection of literary works.

In my severely limited experience, some of the greatest writings have been stark in their simplicity . Perhaps the most striking example of this is C.S. Lewis' writings such as "Reflections on the Psalms" - his other writings , though simple on the face of it , are ,really mind-blowingly profound.

Speaking for myself ,I'm constrained to say ,that most contemporary writing , in contrast ,comes across as spectacularly inelegant and truly banal.That ,perhaps ,should not be surprising- given the dumbing-down phenomenon sweeping across the world . Given this ,any kind of creative endeavour has to pander to the lowest common denominator ,should it seek its 'fifteen seconds of fame'.

But then one couldn't really expect much more from an ethos where Rowling ( and fortunately perhaps Shakespeare )are the Holy Grail at the very apex of the pyramid.

( Posted by: RJKT [Member] On: December 26, 2006 )

Indeed. Kinda.
I don't disagree with anything durnkenmonkeymind has said. Not really. Because the reactive form of writing has always been one that has yielded a great volume and quality of stuff.

But to react... you must have something to react to, yes? And shouldn't we desire to react in ways that are unique, subtle, fresh, interesting, beautiful, intelligent and well crafted?

Here is where rules and history become important. Not as absolutes, but as *more things to react to.* If you do not know the past, know the classics, know history, know context, know culture... you are much more apt to respond, creatively, in a very shallow way. In a manner that has been done a thousand times before. You may end up writing something that, frankly, will be regarded by many others as quite immature.

Which is fine... when you are at that stage of your writing journey. Which is why we have schools and books and programs and sites like this (hurrah!). So that we can go from a place where our reactions are built on internal-only frameworks, to ones that incorporate a much richer set of rules.

Because, of course, we make our own rules inside our heads just as much as any external organization or body will ever try to enforce any grammatical or scholarly set.

So, by all means... reject dogma! Throw out the history and the straight-path and the classics and the piles and heaps of broken images. Do a new dance. But only after you have learned the old ones. Because, otherwise, you are in danger of repeating much that has gone before, and that's a waste of your creative time.

( Posted by: andyhavens [Member] On: January 6, 2007 )

Add Your Comment

You Must be a member to post comments and ratings. If you are NOT already a member, signup now it only takes a few seconds!

All Fields are required

Commenting Guidelines:
  • All comments must be about the writing. Non-related comments will be deleted.
  • Flaming, derogatory or messages attacking other members well be deleted.
  • Adult/Sexual comments or messages will be deleted.
  • All subjects MUST be PG. No cursing in subjects.
  • All comments must follow the sites posting guidelines.
The purpose of commenting on Lit.Org is to help writers improve their writing. Please post constructive feedback to help the author improve their work.