Lit.Org - a community for readers and writers Advanced Search

Average Rating

(0 votes)

You must login to vote

While I was at the University of Pittsburgh the student newspaper did a review of COMPRESSIONISM: THE PITTSBURGH STORIES. I've posted the review on my homepage. Just go to and click on: Vignettes cut to the chase. I agree with everything the reviewer said except that: my stories' endings are "blurry." I suppose what the reviewer meant by this is that I don't tidy up my stories at the end, that I leave that for the reader to do. This is a complaint I heard from professors and classmates at Pitt for years. And they're right. Many times the endings of my stories are not neat (I guess this is why, after saying so many nice things about the book, the reviewer gave me three stars out of five). Some readers like "open-ended endings" and some don't. No doubt open-ended endings are too much like life and not enough like fiction. Well, you can't please everyone. Nor should a writer try to please everyone. Guy.


The following comments are for "BOOK REVIEW"
by ScottDelaney

Add Your Comment

You Must be a member to post comments and ratings. If you are NOT already a member, signup now it only takes a few seconds!

All Fields are required

Commenting Guidelines:
  • All comments must be about the writing. Non-related comments will be deleted.
  • Flaming, derogatory or messages attacking other members well be deleted.
  • Adult/Sexual comments or messages will be deleted.
  • All subjects MUST be PG. No cursing in subjects.
  • All comments must follow the sites posting guidelines.
The purpose of commenting on Lit.Org is to help writers improve their writing. Please post constructive feedback to help the author improve their work.