Lit.Org - a community for readers and writers Advanced Search
 




Average Rating
0.00

(0 votes)

You must login to vote

I started a poem about the Marquis and Shakespeare a couple of weeks ago. I put it off for the Write-Off with Gibson Girl. Little did I know that the spirit of the de Sade lives in me.

*Pleasure* *Pain*

I laid my racket and shuttlecock down and stopped my conversation with "The Bard" to enter a noble good-natured joust with another valued member of this site.

*Pleasure* *Pain*

I was given the word/topic-"colour" which at first glance seemed daunting to me. I struggled with the concept of a poem in ANY form that would make sense to the Write-Off paying public.

*Pleasure* *Pain*

I was not informed of my would-be worthy opponent until both of our poems were accepted by the arbitors of the affair. All that I could hope for was that my jousting stick would not splinter in fear at the thought of facing said worthy opponent.We bowed and waited for the paying public to render a decision.

*Pleasure* *Pain*

I purposely titled my piece without said "colour" so that the general paying public would not know the intended topic. *Pleasure* My worthy opponent Gibson Girl also (intentionally or no) did not give away said topic in her title either.
*Pleasure*


Alas! There were some Knaves who crashed the affair to render unfair assistance to both contestants.For Shame! But I had read several of the competitions beforehand and understood there were knaves crashing the parties going back several Write-Offs. *Pain* To me though, it was not unexpected. It should not have been unexpected by my worthy opponent. *Pain*

After three days of hand-wringing, I felt that my worthy opponent had bested me. I was readying my concession speech before said worthy paying public, when I awoke this morning to her withdrawal. *Pain* (Something about Heebie Jeebies) I do not know a person with the name "Heebie Jeebies" involved in this contest. Even so, he could not have affected the outcome of the Joust. The paying public and the Knave crashers had control.

*Pleasure* *Pain*

I, the Marquis de Sade, was awarded the contest by default.*Pain* I felt no joy at the outcome of this event.

I give homage to worthy paying public and their comments. *Pleasure* I value them as my as yet unborn children.

Alas! (I like that word. *Pleasure*) Some of the Paying public thought maybe perhaps hyjinks had been in play from the beginning. Nay! I Say. Some of the paying public has tarried too long at the wine/whine, or sat on Sir Freud's couch too long, or got themselves stuck in yon Anarchist's Handbook, or lost a bet with God early in the morn. Whatever the malady afflicting said paying public, their angst is for naught. *Pleasure* Some have decided to take their toys and go home.*Pain* There is no need to take such arbitrary action. Furthermore, do not listen to Naysayers nor give them ear to spit in. Come back here and enjoy the brotherhood of the word. Let me soothe your wounded psyches. *Pleasure* Come and let us sit together at the table and drink the written grog together. *Pleasure* I pray you God speed back to where you belong.

Sincerely,

de Sade



Comments

The following comments are for "The Marquis de Sade and Shakespeare Play Badminton"
by williamhill

williamhill's blog
Stylizing the essence of this with references to historical and literary nobility was such a deft move of T&D (tact and diplomacy) on your part! That said, I, as a member of the worthy paying public always vote in favour of the one who ultimately scores lowest (*pain*). I, too, have been invited to joust, but declined (*pain & pleasure*), preferring to applaud from the stands (*pleasure*).
I must return , herewith, to the written grog which grows stale at my neglect of it...
Will you be jousting again?
Lucie

( Posted by: windchime [Member] On: January 13, 2005 )

Oh William
Why did I have to slog through all of that to get to your point. Good God, sometimes I think I've stumbled onto a site for rennaisance fans, based on all the flowery language. Once again, I must attempt to coax litorges out of the fantasy world into the temporal. Honestly, I've never witnessed such latent hostility to honest crit. Its time to give the voice of dissent its due. So many cannot be so wrong. Open thine ears.

( Posted by: brad [Member] On: January 13, 2005 )

Charlie a ten to you.
Charlie I mucked up the scoring in the write off, but this Ten is now yours. I enjoyed this a lot. As usual you behaved like the gentleman you are. Well done on that and this blog. It was fun to see you having fun with this as well as getting your message over. warm regards huni.

To Brad. I like your work and am just edgy enough to enjoy most of your comments. This time though I think you have gone beyond the pale. Charlie (unless I'm way off base) was not discussing criticism at all. He was explaining, using humour and playing with words, what happened in the failed write off. Also, politely asking people to return and join the fun again. So many can not be wrong about what. The comment of yours seems disjointed and themeless. I also get a strong sense that feel your job here is to bring us 'litorges' around to your way. By joining, you are one of us. You are welcome. Just be here.

As to Charlie's style. Come on Brad, this is a blog and we are writers. Sometimes we can just have fun with words can't we? We all love the little blighters after all. Not everything has to be ready for the printing press or terribly meaningful all the time surely. My husband and I have tremendous fun in lectures, talks, and sermons sending each other notes along the lines of Charlie's piece just because we get to play with words. I hope this doesn't get me kicked out of class! huni.

( Posted by: Huni [Member] On: January 13, 2005 )

Brad
Dissent for dissent's sake is not dissent,It is foolhardiness. One must be informed, which you were not, nor were a lot of other people. This Ren. language was an attempt to soothe people whose feelings are hurt, poke fun at myself, and explain exactly what happened to cause this mess in the first place. You may blame Jessica all you want, but not one little bit of this Write-Off was her fault. I am sorry to say that there are people out with long knives to rid themselves of her. It has been that way for awhile now. Your information has been flawed. This food fight is about something you still know nothing about. All you have to do is e-mail Bart or Jess or better yet,Crowe. Ears are not my problem. I hearest fine.

hill.


Thanks for the read ,Lucie. I will be in another contest soon, I think.

charlie.

( Posted by: williamhill [Member] On: January 13, 2005 )





Add Your Comment

You Must be a member to post comments and ratings. If you are NOT already a member, signup now it only takes a few seconds!

All Fields are required

Commenting Guidelines:
  • All comments must be about the writing. Non-related comments will be deleted.
  • Flaming, derogatory or messages attacking other members well be deleted.
  • Adult/Sexual comments or messages will be deleted.
  • All subjects MUST be PG. No cursing in subjects.
  • All comments must follow the sites posting guidelines.
The purpose of commenting on Lit.Org is to help writers improve their writing. Please post constructive feedback to help the author improve their work.


Username:
Password:
Subject:
Comment:





Login:
Password: