Lit.Org - a community for readers and writers Advanced Search
 




Average Rating
8.85

(7 votes)


RatingRated by
8Unknown
10Unknown
10Unknown
10Unknown
5Unknown
9Unknown
10Unknown

You must login to vote

Author’s note: What you are about to read is very true, or in other words Non-fiction.

What is murder? The dictionary defines it as ‘the illegal deliberate killing of one person by another.’ Pretty clear-cut isn’t it? Someone’s angry, upset, maybe even hurt, or confused, so they take a knife, a gun, maybe use their hands and kill whoever has wronged them. In some situations there doesn’t even have to be a qualified ‘wrong’.

Take for instance an eighteen-year-old freshman at Radford University, Gina Hall. Gina Hall was your regular run of the mill ‘good girl’. She wasn’t a drug addict she didn’t drink, or even smoke. She wasn’t an easy girl for a guy to hit on and in no way was she promiscuous. You’re probably asking, Jessica how do you know that? Well I’ve studied Gina Hall for years now. Studied her? Yes, studied. Gina was murdered in 1980. Only an hour away from where I live. Well dozens of people are murdered all the time why pick out Gina? I’m not sure I can ever answer that question. It started as a thesis for a term paper my senior year in high school. We had to pick a law or something from the Constitution and construct a paper around it. I needed this paper to pull up a grade so I thought why not find an actual case of some kind and tie it in with how the laws helped either prove or disprove the case. Thus bringing my attention to the murder of Gina Hall.

Enough background right? You want to know how it happened. How this eighteen-year old was murdered? Well so do I, and here her story begins:

Gina had just finished her midterms and excitedly called her sister to see if she could go and celebrate with her. Her sister was unable to go, and Gina decided she would venture out alone, something she rarely ever did. Anyone that knew Gina also knew how modest she was and that she had a good strong character. Gina was also nervously self-conscious. When she was younger, she had an accident, which left horrible scares over the middle section of her body. Therefore, Gina dressed conservatively, to cover her scars. That night she dressed in a purple body suit with white jeans and a jacket.

She drove to the Marriott a hotel slash restaurant and met up with two friends, Bill King and Robin Robinson. Stephen Epperly, six feet tall and charming was also there. He was the grounds keeper at Radford University and at times a substitute teacher for a nearby high school. After talking awhile, the group decided to meet back at Bill King’s stepparents home, the Davis’ who were away on vacation. Stephen Epperly didn’t have a car, he asked Gina for a ride. The group split up and headed for the doors but didn’t reach the house at the same time.

Bill King later testified in court that when he and Robin finally reached his stepparents house, that Epperly and Gina Hall were not there. King states that he saw Epperly an hour later coming through the utility room door while wiping himself with a blue towel, but Gina was nowhere in sight. Stephen Epperly left and Bill King and his girlfriend were left alone. Gina Hall disappeared that night.

Three days after her disappearance, a missing persons case had been ruled out, and the police decided to search the Davis’ home. When the police and forensics team arrived at the Davis’ home, they started their search in the den area. First, they found blood on the arm of a chair then shockingly, discovered an eighteen-inch-wide pool of blood near the sliding glass door soaked into the carpet. On finding this horrific evidence the police had probably cause to move on to other rooms of the house. Out of the den and into the utility room that doubled as a catch all for all the family out door junk. They found blood on a pair of golf shoes, a pair of brown shoes, on the refrigerator door, on the tip of a mattock, on the inside and outside of an empty water pitcher, and in the heel of a dustpan. Their search continued throughout the rest of the house. Flecks of blood were found on a light switch in the bathroom and on a faucet handle.

The police decided to search for items missing from the house. A quilt from the Davis’ bedroom and the blue towel Epperly used to wipe himself were nowhere to be found. Though the evidence of blood was pilling up the police still had no clue as to where Gina Hall, dead or alive, could be.

Aside from searching the Davis home, the police wanted to search a four-mile perimeter around the Davis home. Gina was after all, a grown woman who had gone missing. What they found surprised them and devastated the family. Remember what Gina was wearing the night she disappeared? The police found every item of clothing she had on that night at the Marriott. Remember the scars she kept hidden? Does this sound like something Gina would do? Oddly enough, the contents of her pocketbook had been placed neatly under a brush pile two feet from where her clothing was found. If Gina were still alive, she was without any money, or clothing for that matter.

Next the authorities found Gina Hall’s brown Monte Carol abandoned under a railroad trestle with the trunk open. Streaks of dried blood were found in the carpet of the trunk and strangely enough, the driver’s seat in the car was pushed completely back. Why was that strange? Can you recall how tall Epperly was? (Six feet) Testimonies in Gina Hall’s behalf stated that she only stood five foot one and that ‘she had to drive with the seat so far up that is was uncomfortable for anyone else to drive her car without first adjusting the seat.’ Someone had to have been in Gina’s car. By now the evidence of ever finding Gina alive was growing dim.

Now this is my favorite part of the whole case. The police, tired and exhausted their leads saw a need for a tracking dog. Enter John Preston and his dog, Harrass Two. From Pennsylvania Preston and his dog hoped a plane so they could help. Epperly was the last person to be seen with Gina, so obviously the dog was given Epperly’s scent near Gina’s abandoned car. The police were hopeful but discouraged at the same time, for two days the weather had been nothing but solid rain. So when Preston took off with his dog they were tracking in three inches of mud. Does this deter Harrass Two or Preston for that matter? No way. Harrass Two picks up Epperly’s scent and follows it straight to Gina’s car still parked under the railroad trestle. Preston let the dog continue after all the dog had just proved Epperly had been there. Harrass Two walks the length of Memorial Bridge, the comes back and starts up a dirt path onto first street, where he then walks through the bay of a car wash on his way up writ street where he sits down on his meaty haunches in front of Stephen Epperly’s front door. Amazing you say, and after two days of rain no less. But my friend it gets better.

This is when and where the police discovered the bloody blue towel that Epperly used to wipe himself. To make sure the dog truly had Epperly’s scent, Preston wanted to use the bloody towel in a little test for his dog. Seven towels, plus the bloody one were tossed onto the floor in a pile for Harrass Two to pick through. Harrass Two picked the right one with ease. Preston freed the dog to track Epperly again.

The dog made a direct beeline for the police station’s parking lot, where Epperly’s car was parked. Harrass Two circled Epperly’s car a few times letting Preston know this is where Epperly’s scent was. John Preston was proud of his dog as well he should be, they had accomplished what they had set out to do. Preston lead Harrass Two into the station house for a rest, but Harrass Two had other things on his mind. Once inside Harrass Two continued to follow Epperly’s scent until he reached a closed door and couldn’t go any farther. Stephen Epperly was being held on the other side of that door for questioning.

Now I could go into all the evidence that helped put Epperly behind bars. Direct evidence, where Gina and Epperly were seen leaving the Marriott together or circumstantial evidence, when Bill King testified he saw Epperly enter the Davis home and wipe himself with a towel. I could bore you with tons of that. Instead, I’m jumping straight for what made this case so unusual. It’s been twenty-two years and still they haven’t found Gina Hall’s body.

All the blood the police found was hers. Epperly didn’t have an alibi and never denied or admitted to murdering Gina. When he was advised to tell the authorities where the body was Epperly’s reply was “I’ll think about it.” At one time Bill King confronted Stephen Epperly with a point-blank question, “Did you kill Gina Hall?” Epperly’s unconcerned reply was “Bill, I don’t know anything about it, we’ll just have to wait and see.”

Epperly now sits behind bars for life without chance of parole. Still no body present the jurors believed beyond a reasonable doubt that Epperly was guilty of murder. Does it help to know that Epperly was taken to court on two separate rape charges before being convicted of murder but that the charges were dropped? I think so, it adds to the fact that this man wasn’t normal and was capable of going to extremes in order to get what he wanted.

I’ve met Epperly’s lawyer, Mr. Lookabill, we’ve kept in touch over the years. Over all he’s a good man, aside from his choice of job that is. He too is still sickened by this unexplainable case. He believes Epperly did it, admits that Epperly was a psychotic, though he made me swear not to print that (sorry Mr. Lookabill but you defended a murderer). The police determined, as well as the forensic scientists, that in order for the amount of blood to be found and found where it was that Gina Hall was most definitely beaten to death. Beaten in fact, so hard that the specks of blood found in the utility room had indeed come flying from the den area to land on the shoes, pitcher and other items. What a horrible, gruesome death. Now, the next question that pops to mind is, why. Why did this man murder such an innocent, nice, well-rounded girl he had just met? I think its safe to say that when Gina left the Marriott with Epperly, knowing her friends were right behind her, she wasn’t going with any intention whatsoever of having sex with Epperly. But I do think (and so does the prosecutor of this case) that this is what brought on Gina’s death. It was sex. This man’s raw desire for her and her rebuff of him and he killed her. And if that wasn’t enough he disposed of the body, hiding it so that family and friends would never see her again.

Today, in my hometown, rumors still circulate on the location of Gina Hall’s body. At the time of her murder, a mental hospital was being built close to the Davis’ home. The concrete was poured and left to set the day of her disappearance. There are rumors her body lies in the foundation of that building. Others believe she was hidden away in the endless underwater caves that lay south of where she was killed. Questions, too, are still being asked. Why hasn’t Epperly revealed her whereabouts? Is this his way of getting the final word? Does he keep it to himself to hurt Gina’s family? I don’t think he’ll talk. But if he does, his lawyer is supposed to give me a call.

------
Jessica@Lit.Org or Jessicamg@gmail.com

~How vain it is to sit down and write when you have not stood up to live.~

Henry David Thoreau


Related Items

Comments

The following comments are for "A Murder"
by jessicanm

Cool Story
Sounds like a case for "Murder She Wrote." heh, heh.

Anyway, it was fun to read a non-fiction story for a change. You told it in an interesting fashion that really built the suspense. I like that you described the girl first. This enabled the reader to sympathize her. And I liked how it wrapped up with questioning his motives. This way the reader will still think about the story even after they're done reading.

I didn't like that you broke your promise to the attorney though. I think that takes away from the story a little bit. In future revisions, I'd leave that out.

Lastly, you write so damn much when do you sleep?

Parteepants

( Posted by: Richard Dani [Member] On: March 12, 2002 )

Dare for Parteepants
Thanks for the comments Parteepants. And you know what I knew something was off about the lawyer thing. I'm glad you picked up on it, I'll just be deleting that little ditty on out of there. I'm glad you liked it.

As for when do I sleep? Not very often my friend. 'I love the night life' ;) Hey, all of us around here at lit. know you can write horror but you know what I'd like to see Mr. Pants? I'd like to see just how well you could dish out a sappy romance, kisses, looks, soft touches and all. Care to rise to the challenge? (Should I say I dare you?) ;)
Seriously though, if you're like me and your heart isn't in it, then it's harder to write but I think it would make for a pretty cool piece if you gave it a try. Just something the romantic in me would like to see. ;)

~Jessica

( Posted by: jessicanm [Member] On: March 12, 2002 )

Romance? Hmmm
I like challenges and this could be a tough one.I'm not much of a romantic, which probably isn't much of a shock. But challenge are fun and different. And besides, I think I could score some brownie points with my wife. So, you're on. I don't know how good it will be. Is hitting someone with a hammer romantic? Oh well, I'll figure it out.

Thanks for the nice words and you're welcome for the comments. The pleasure was mine. By the way, you probably should be writing something too. How about science fiction? That's probably as different for you as romance is for me. What do you think? Can you walk the walk?

Parteepants

( Posted by: Richard Dani [Member] On: March 12, 2002 )

reminds me of...........
reminds me of an agatha christie novel which at one time I enjoyed reading. It seemed a bit long to call it a short story. sounds like a mystery that will never be solved.

( Posted by: mrs foxyL [Member] On: March 12, 2002 )

Mr. Pants you're on
Oh no, I thought the minute I dared you, you would come back with something like that. What have I done? No, seriously I'll give science fiction a fighting chance. Question though, do we have a time limit? Couple of weeks? Days? What? April 1st?
And I have to agree your wife would probably look at you in a whole new light, but not if you put in that hammer thing. HA!

Consider this me accepting your dare!!
May the best 'out of their limit' writer win. (so to speak)

~Jessica

( Posted by: jessicanm [Member] On: March 12, 2002 )

Re: Mrs. Foxyl
Thanks for the comments. Yeah I think it was a little to long for a short story and it hit me after I posted it that I probably stuck it in the wrong category since its not really a story. More than likely I should have stuck it in columns or editorals. Forgive me my indiscretion

~Jessica

( Posted by: jessicanm [Member] On: March 12, 2002 )

Info on Mr. Pants! To jessica
I liked your story too by the way. People like Epperly are sick, and that by no means is an excuse, it is only the explaination. He deserves to be where he is or worse...

Now, about Parteepants... Don't let him fool you! I have all the confidence in the world he could write in any genre you could think of. You can tell by the story primers he comes up with for the Write Off's.

As a matter of fact though, a lot of the writing at lit is infectious! I never used to kill off my characters until I became a regular here!

All in fun! I am a hopeless romantic myself. I'm not much for candle light dinners, but I open doors for everyone. That's romantic isn't it?

8 > )

The Hal

( Posted by: The Hal [Member] On: March 12, 2002 )

Jump on HAL
Thanks for the info on Parteepants. I know he plays hardball.He's like the guys that talk all smooth and you don't realize you've been hit until after. Thanks Hal, you've got my back right? ;)

And opening doors for everyone is romantic. You called yourself a hopeless romantic, would you care to rise to the challenge I issued Mr. Pants. How about a little love story yourself? Something maybe I could compare to Mr. Pants and see whom I think is the better? A sort of write off of our own? Sound good, are you picking up what I'm putting down?

Hey, if I keep issuing these dares to members here at lit. I might just turn it in to a girly site. oh, the horror! Wouldn't Crowe just love that one. :) I'm only teasing. But I would love to have you on board this test of our ability thing. Come on, you know you want to!

~Jessica

( Posted by: jessicanm [Member] On: March 13, 2002 )

Time Limit? & Hal
Thanks for the props Hal and I hope you join us in this little exercise. After all, the main reason I'm participating is your "What's My Line" exercise. That produced one of my better stories and who knows, maybe this will too.

As for a time limit, I could probably have mine up by Saturday or Sunday. I'm gonna have to do a little research. Well, a lot actually. But I'm not looking to produce a novella here. Just something between 1000 and 1500 words. I already have a story in mind so I just need the time to type it.

Jessicanm, if that is too soon for you, we can post them next week or weekend.

Let me know.

Parteepants

( Posted by: Richard Dani [Member] On: March 13, 2002 )

Sunday sounds good
Parteepants, let me first say that you make me sick, already having something in mind to write about. :) I can have mine up by Sunday so lets go for that. And as hard as it is, me being a woman and all I'll try and keep mine to 1500 words. Whew, this is going to be harder than I thought.

Good Luck,
~Jessica

( Posted by: jessicanm [Member] On: March 13, 2002 )

Your On
Sunday it is...so bring your tissues.

Parteepants

( Posted by: Richard Dani [Member] On: March 13, 2002 )

Sure, I'm in!
I'll give it a shot as well. I once wrote a romantic story. I printed it out and showed it to my wife and she wanted to know when it was that I started writing porn. heh...

I'll adjust my idea of romanic a little I believe! Don't worry... I'll be good.

The Hal

( Posted by: The Hal [Member] On: March 13, 2002 )

It's Outstanding Work !

Jessi, I read your ‘A Murder’ and it was really an exceptional and outstanding work ! Hats off to you.
I was really touched and moved reading your work.I really felt very sad for that girl called ‘Gina Hall’.
An innocent life is lost for no fault of hers. People like Epperly should be sentenced to death, without any mercy, whatsoever.
If I were to be the judge of this murder case, then Epperly wouldn’t have been lived so long behind
Bars. I sometimes even wonder how these people Get heart to do such gruesome things in life ? When one can’t give life…one dosen’t have the
Right to take it, right ?

( Posted by: g.s.vasukumar [Member] On: March 18, 2002 )

"A Murder"
Are you sure of the facts you presented?

( Posted by: Scooter [Member] On: January 15, 2003 )

Scooter
Sure as I can be, I interviewed the lawyer and Epperly himself, plus I work with Gina's hall sister and her family lives not 15 minutes from me. I studied over the transcripts and talked to everyone and anyone I could. I'm sure no one can have all the exact info on any case like this and keep in mind Epperly hasn't helped any. But hey, if there's something out there I overlooked and I'm sure there is no one is perfect and I haven't boned up on the case here of late but I'd be happy to hear it and look in to it again. This one will always be with me, so I like all the info I can get. Why do you ask, have any info you're willing to share?

~Jessica

( Posted by: Jessicanm [Member] On: January 16, 2003 )

Gina Hall
Jessica,

Wow you really have done your research. I am a really close friend to Woody Lookabill, knew him all my life and so I am quite familiar with this case. Have read the transcripts and talked with him as well. In fact Stephen Epperly worked with my father at the Bear Supermarket when they were teenagers. My father often remarked that there was something no quite right with him even then. You talk about the specks of blood that were found and how it was evident that she was beaten to death, in fact they figuered that a golf club was used as the blunt force to commit this horrible crime. Another comment that Epperely said to his lawyer was, "If someone commits murder and they can not find the body can he still be convicted of murder?" A very chilling statement since this was before he was convicted or charged with her murder. I seriously doubt that Epperly will ever openly confess or tell anyone where the body was hidden because to this day he still says that he is innocent. I do not know if you know this, but this is the only case in VA where the body was not found and the person was still convicted of murder. At least that was the case until 2000. I do not know if there has been any cases since then. Good work though, you seem to have a personal tie to the story and often times that is when your message gets through to "the masses" so to speak. As to Mr. Lookabill, sometimes people are forced to do things that they really do not want to do. When you are a public defender, it is sometimes difficult. He is the Clerk of Court now for Pulaski County, and his heart is much more at ease. Again, good work on your research.

( Posted by: mdhzack [Member] On: September 27, 2004 )

Mdhzack Thank you
Wow, it really is a small world. I just want to make sure that you know I mean no disrespect at all when it comes to Mr. Lookabill. I have a lot of respect for him and always will. I do appreciate your comment and all the info.

I knew it was thought to be a golf club but since they didn't have enough 'evidence' to back it up I couldn't use it in my report. As for the comment about could he still be convicted if they can't find the body, oh yes, I knew that one too, I have all the transcripts from the case and closing arguments. Has anyone ever told you what Epperly said when Harass Two sniffed him out all the way back to where he was being held? They let the dog in the room, where he goes up to him and sniffs of course. They tell Epperly what the dog has just done, he pets the dog and says, 'that's a damn good dog, a damn good dog.'

No, he'll never confess to where he left Gina and her family will always be bothered by that. I use to work with Gina's half sister and everytime Epperly comes up for parole she and I are both out getting petitions signed to keep him behind bars on the off chance they would think about getting him out.


Thanks for the update on Mr. Lookabill I do hope his heart is at ease now with the job change. He's done a wonderful job before and I'm sure now as a clerk of court he'll do a wonderful job there.

I do appreciate the update on such a tragic true story.

~Jessica

( Posted by: Jessicanm [Member] On: September 27, 2004 )

John Preston
Mr. Epperly may have in fat been the killer of of Gina Hall. But John Preston is in no way an impressive man. His in court lies have brought about the wrongful convictions of Juan Ramos (FL death penalty case), Henry Sutton (Arizona) and, most notably, Wilton Dedge. Wilton Dedge was released after DNA testing confirmed that he could not have been the prepetrator of a brutal rape. He served 22 years for a crime he didn't commit.

Also, it is important to note that those cases were not the only ones in which problems arose with Preston and Harass II (also another dog named "Bear"). Preston was the subject of a 20/20 story in October 1985 or 1986 in which Geraldo Rivera investigated the overturned convictions and the in court lies that Mr. Preston told.

Like I said, maybe Mr. Epperly is guilty of the crime. But I would have second thoughts of the guilt of a man who has been in prison all of these years, was put there by Preston, and maintained his innocence all of those years. After all, thats exactly what happened to Wilton Dedge.

( Posted by: lawyerguyfl [Member] On: January 3, 2005 )

more info on Preston
http://www.innocenceproject.org/case/display_profile.php?id=149
Wilton Dedge profile

http://www.sptimes.com/2004/11/14/State/Guilty_until_proven_i.shtml
St. Petersburg Times article on Wilton Dedge

( Posted by: lawyerguyfl [Member] On: January 3, 2005 )

re;Lawyerguyfl
Think what you will of John Preston we all have faults and misdoings but Epperly was found guilty of Gina Halls murder not only on the information Preston helped recover but many many many other things as well. And Epperly doesn't maintane his innocence, he just refuses to tell where the body is...! Anyway thanks for the comment and for bringing this one back up from the archives. I still think Preston and his dogs do good work.


~Jessica

( Posted by: Jessicanm [Member] On: January 3, 2005 )

Not a mental institution
There is speculation that Gina is entombed in cement, but it isn't the mental institution, it is the Dedmon Center on RU campus. Epperly was working on campus at the time and it was about 24 hours after she disappeared that they poured the cement for the foundation of the Dedmon Center (officially opened in 1981).

( Posted by: sparky122402 [Member] On: October 10, 2005 )

An add on
This past week I've got a few emails from a few different people after reading my article above. I thought I'd post my original school article for additional info so I don't have to continue to email all the other parts of the case that I didn't put in the above.

Some things with the case have changed. Epperly comes up for parole every 7 years, which I always write a letter and get a petition going to keep him behind bars and now there are even more guess on where Gina's body is. We'll never know....

“The United States Constitution clearly states in Article 1, Section 9, that the privilege of the Writ, or federal legal document, of Habeas Corpus, shall not be suspended in a court of law, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion, the public safety may require it” (Academic 4). It was the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, however, that firmly established the legal power of this write and the ways to enforce it. The Latin term Habeas Corpus means “To have the body;” however, in the case The Commonwealth of Virginia v. Stephen Matteson Epperly, Stephen Epperly was convicted of 1st degree murder even though the victims body was never discovered.
In criminal cases the main burden of the prosecution is to prove guilty beyond reasonable doubt: otherwise, the person accused cannot be convicted of the crime. In the list of court instructions given to each jury member before the trial of Stephen Matteson Epperly, court instruction number 10 states that

It is no necessary that facts be proven by direct evidence for they may also be proven by circumstantial evidence alone or on circumstantial evidence combined with other evidence if you believe from all the evidence that the defendant is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. (Transcript 14)

Lawyers produce facts on which each side relies on for a winning case. The jurors have to take into consideration all of the evidence produced during the trial while making the decision of guilty or not guilty. The jurors consider the facts produced by the lawyers along with the court instructions before reaching a final verdict.
As an eighteen-year-old freshman at Radford University, Gina Hall had just finished mid-terms and excitedly called her sister to see if she could go and celebrate with her. Her sister was unable to go, and Gina decided she would venture out alone, something she rarely ever did. Gina was well known in the community for her modesty and good character. Gina, being especially self-conscious of the horrible scars over the mid section of her body, dressed in a purple body suit with white jeans and jacket. She drove to the Marriott and met up with a good friend of hers, Bill King. Later on that night she meet the six foot tall Stephen Epperly, the grounds keeper at Radford University and a substitute teacher at Pulaski County High School. After talking for awhile, the group decided to meet at the Davis’ home, Bill King’s step-parents. Since Stephen Epperly did not have a car, he asked Gina for a ride to the Davis’ home.
Bill Kind later testified in court that when he and his girl-friend, Robin Robinson, finally reached his step-parents house, that Epperly and Gina Hall were not there. An hour later King state that he saw Epperly coming through the utility room door while wiping himself with a blue towel, but Gina was not with him. Stephen Epperly left and Bill King and his girlfriend were once again left alone.
Three days later after Gina Hall disappeared and a missing persons case had been ruled out, the police decided to search the Davis’ home. When the police and forensics team arrived at the Davis’ home, they decided to start with the den area. There they found blood on the arm of a chair and, shockingly, discovered an eighteen-inch-wide pool of blood near the sliding glass door. On finding this evidence the police decided to move onto the other rooms of the house. In the utility room they round specks of blood ona pair of golf shoes, on a pair of brown shoes, on the refrigerator door, on the tip of a mattock, on the inside and outside of a water pitcher, and in the heel of a dustpan. Continuing with a further search of the house, the forensics team also found specks of blood on a light switch in the bathroom and on the faucet handle. A quilt from the Davis’ bedroom and the blue towel Epperly used to wipe himself was also missing from the house. Not only did the police not find these things, they also could not find Gina Hall’s body.
The police decided to search a four mild perimeter around the Davis’ house in hopes of uncovering evidence. While searching, the police found every item of clothing that Gina was wearing that night at the Marriott. Also recovered were the contents of Gina’s pocketbook that had been placed neatly under a brush pile within two feet of where her clothing was found. They continued to find Gina Hall’s brown Monte Carlo abandoned under a railroad trestle with the trunk of the car open. Streaks of dried blood were found in the carpet of the trunk and strangely enough, the driver’s seat in the car was pushed completely back. Testimonies in Gina Hall’s behalf stated that she only stood five foot one and that “she had to drive with the seat so far up that it was uncomfortable for anyone else to drive her car without adjusting the seat first.” (Transcript 16).
As the evidence began building, the police saw the need for a tracking dog. A call laws made to Pennsylvania for John Preston and his dog, Harrass Two. Since Epperly was the last known person to be seen with Gina, the dog was given Epperly’s scent near Gina’s abandoned car. After two days of solid rain and three inches of mud, Harrass Two picks up Epperly’s scent and follows it up to where Gina’s car was found under a railroad trestle. The dog walks the length of Memorial Bridge, then comes back and starts up a dirt path into First Street, where Harrass Two walks through the last bay of a car wash and continues up Writ Street to sit down in front of Stephen Epperly’s front door.
The bloody blue towel that Epperly used to wipe himself with was discovered in Epperly’s house at this time. To make sure the dog had Epperly’s scent, the bloody blue towel, along with seven other towels, was thrown onto the floor in a pile for harass Two to pick through for the right one. On picking the right towel, the dog was once again freed to track Epperly. The dog, making a direct path for the police station’s parking lot, circled Epperly’s car. John Preston assuming his job was finished took Harrass Two into the station for a rest, only to follow the dog to where Epperly was being questioned at that time. Still Gina Hall’s body had not been found.
In the case involving Stephen Epperly there are several categories of evidence that helped put him behind bars. Bill King stated that he saw Epperly and hall leave the Marriott together; this is called direct evidence. Bill King testified that he saw Epperly enter the Davis’ house alone and wipe himself with a blue towel; this type of evidence is called circumstantial. The major type of evidence produced in this case was categorized as real, commonly known as physical objects. The blood the Forensic team tested proved to be Type O blood which was also Gina Hall’s blood type. “Basically all evidence is testimonial in the sense that it is either exclusively verbal or documentary.” (Joseph 5). When Gina Hall’s friends and relatives took to the stand and testified what a good person she was and about her morals and high standards this is called character evidence. “Character evidence is admissible in criminal cases through proof of the accused general reputation” (Joseph 5).
Epperly did not deny murdering Gina Hall, not once, nor did he admit it, but when advised to tell where the body was Epperly replied, “I’ll think about it” (Transcript 19). When Bill King confronted Stephen Epperly with a point-blank question of “Did you kill Gina Hall?” Epperly unconcerned reply was “Bill, I don’t know anything about it, we’ll just have to wait and see” (Transcript 19).
While trying to prove Stephen Epperly’s motive, the prosecution state that

Gina was not promiscuous and she was not into drugs or alcohol. She was not a pick-up and she was not going out there with any intention whatsoever of going to bed with Stephen Epperly, but that’s what brought it all about. It was sex. This man’s raw desier for hre and her rebuff of him and he killed her, and if that wasn’t enough he disposed of the body. He his the body so that family and friends would never see her again (transcript 24-25)

Epperly’s lawyer, Mr. Lookabill, admitted to the court that Epperly had made advances toward Gina Hall the night she disappeared.
Sixteen years later and Gina Hall’s body is still missing. Did Stephen Matteson Epperly receive a fair trail? Once again, habeas Corpus means “to have the body.” As the Prosecution’s attorney, Mr. Shockley, advised “the law does not require the production of a body, but the law does require the Commonwealth to prove death beyond a reasonable doubt” (Transcript 15). With all the evidence, the jurors believed beyond a reasonable doubt that Epperly was guilty even without Gina Hall’s body. Even though Epperly was taken to court on two separate rape charges before he was convicted of murdering Gina Hall, he was never convicted of the charges brought against him. Justice was served when Epperly received his life sentence. On December 16, the Virginia Supreme Court also agree with this conviction and sentence.
Today rumors still circulate of where Gina Hall’s body is. Some say her body was laid to rest in the foundation of the St. Alban’s building. Others believe she was hidden away in the endless underwater caves that lay south of Draper, Virginia. Questions, too, are still being asked as to why Epperly hasn’t revealed the whereabouts of Gina Hall’s body. Even without the body, the weight of circumstantial evidence had confines Stephen Epperly to jail for life.

( Posted by: Jessicanm [Member] On: July 9, 2006 )





Add Your Comment

You Must be a member to post comments and ratings. If you are NOT already a member, signup now it only takes a few seconds!

All Fields are required

Commenting Guidelines:
  • All comments must be about the writing. Non-related comments will be deleted.
  • Flaming, derogatory or messages attacking other members well be deleted.
  • Adult/Sexual comments or messages will be deleted.
  • All subjects MUST be PG. No cursing in subjects.
  • All comments must follow the sites posting guidelines.
The purpose of commenting on Lit.Org is to help writers improve their writing. Please post constructive feedback to help the author improve their work.


Username:
Password:
Subject:
Comment:





Login:
Password: