Lit.Org - a community for readers and writers Advanced Search
 




Average Rating
0.00

(0 votes)

You must login to vote

Great category! After all this time, didn't even know it existed...Like ranting without the rant. Hmmm...Okay, so I'll write these out, without mention of who sent them. Enjoy!

#5: "Lucie, Thank you for your poetry submission to us here at *** **********. Unfortunately, while we enjoyed reading these, in the end we decided against keeping any of them for publication. We feel that, while these show promise, they can still be more fully developed in terms of their language: metaphor, image, idea, etc. Thanks again for letting us have a look. All the best." *signature*

(handwritten, in red, on separate sheet of paper)

#4: "Dear Poet, Thank you for your recent submission to ******** ******. Unfortunately, it does not fit our needs at the present time. We appreciate the time and effort you took in sending us your poetry, so we thought we would give you some issues of ******** ******. We wish you good fortune in placing your work elsewhere. Sincerely, etc"

(form letter, but with giveaways, and polite)

#3: "Dear Submitter, We appreciate the time and effort it took to create and send us your work - and above all the chance it gave us to see it. As ****** ******'* readership and reputation continue to grow, we receive more and more excellent submissions. Currently we have a considerable backlog of work we have already accepted for publication. Consequently, we are forced to set the bar for acceptance of current submissions almost impossibly high. We thought you would want to know that your work was judged by these standards, which preclude acceptance at this time. Please excuse the necessity of sending you a slip like this one. Best of luck on placing your work elsewhere. And thanks for thinking of us. The Editors."

(form letter, not slip, on 8.5 by 11 paper, using a nice font)

#2: "These aren't bad but they don't jump at me, either. Because we're in Poet's Market we get 100's of submissions. To get accepted, something has to be striking, not merely competent. Keep at it." *signature*

(handwritten, in red medium point ink roller, at the bottom of the cover letter)

#1: "Didn't eviscerate me, but I appreciate your talent. Thanks for the look."

(handwritten, in black fine ballpoint, at the bottom of the cover letter)

I think editors' comments need to be either useful, or absent altogether, but that's just me.


I think number 3 is incredibly etiquette-conscious, and respectful, as well.

Number two has the kind of handwriting that says "I don't have time for you but never mind...Here, have this!" Love that 'tude. Love being seen as "merely competent".

Number one, though, will be my fave for a while yet, I suspect, as I still laugh out loud reading it. Eviscerate???


Thanks, everyone, for partaking,

Lucie

------
Of all known institutions, I attend only two: church, in my heart, and school, in yours. Both are subject to demolition. - Lucie Adams, 2007
It is only for poetry to know how many stanzas fit into one caress. - Lucie Adams, 2008



Comments

The following comments are for "Some faves of mine"
by windchime

Rejection
Thanks for sharing these, windchime. It's fascinating to see what these editors have told you. That "merely competent" line is hilarious. Damning you with faint praise, it seems.

Well, we love ya here at Lit, anyway!

I've found that the best way to prevent rejection is by not submitting anything. Because I'm a coward -- unlike you!

( Posted by: Viper9 [Member] On: April 19, 2006 )

the rejection letter i got once
dear ********* thank you for sending this wounderful poetry blah blah blah but because of the racist remarks used in your poem it connot be placed in this weeks collum

it was a poem about wolfs ,fucking wolfs
how bout that its not exact but thats about it

( Posted by: schindees [Member] On: April 19, 2006 )

Eviscerate
Lucie, Do you mean to tell me that this guy wanted your poetry to disembowel him? I guess he wanted a blood and guts poem...like I slept with my gun next to me and then I blew my brains out all over the wall in the morning...I've seen it over and over in poetry contests where I knew my poems were better than then ones that got picked...they pick the most depressing suicidal ones...I think along with many others here that your poems are tops...I'm glad you could laugh at those idiot rejection letters...they don't deserve you...Kacee

( Posted by: Nitz Kitty [Member] On: April 19, 2006 )

Viper, Schindees, Kacee
Know what? I still open 'em last, after the junk, after the bills, after the charity sollicitations, even after personal mail...I still take a deep breath, and I still let it out slowly. Rejection is, after all, rejection, right?

Viper, who'd a thunk I'd live long enough to be "merely competent"? Hahahaha! Thank you, dear heart, for your acceptance of me. You? A coward? With, um, That, for an avatar?? Don't think so...

Schindees, Betcha the editor who sent you that for a rejection is a werewolf (...) I wouldn't send him anything else, especially on a full moon...

Kacee, I don't know about that guy...I'm thinking maybe if I grabbed him at, say, the level of the navel, he might unravel downwards, until he finally feels comfortable enough to run away on his hands!!! I've given this much thought, but can't come up with any good ideas about how to eviscerate a poetry editor...I'll catch up with some colleagues of mine who are O.R. nurses maybe this week...Jeez...
Your vote of confidence means a lot to me. Thanks, and God Bless!

Lucie

( Posted by: windchime [Member] On: April 19, 2006 )

rejection letter
I didn't know they exist. I joined a book critiquing group, one that also publishes children's books/stories, and submitted one short story. I didn't get any rejection letter at all, I was 20 yrs old then and didn't know about it. (Now, I am hoping that they did send me such considering I was part of their group, just for experiencing it.LOL) In the past months I emailed some of my poetry to few local magazines and still didn't get any rejection letter. Lucie, publishers in your city/country are very polite! I have a suspicion my works are still on queue, all yet to be read?!

( Posted by: peterpaulino [Member] On: April 21, 2006 )

lucie
he might of been a werewolf and ive got a questin whos av were you talkin bout

( Posted by: schindees [Member] On: April 21, 2006 )

never mind
im sry never mind ive got some other ones that ill break out

( Posted by: schindees [Member] On: April 21, 2006 )

Rejection letters
I thought they were pretty decent rejection letters, especially when an editor will actually take the time to write anything in longhand. And I think being called "competent" is meant to be a compliment. Better than getting a cold, impersonal form letter.

I remember a famous poet (Adrienne Rich, I think) who was the editor of Poetry Northwest. She said they received so many good poems that they couldn't possibly accept them all or else each issue would be thick as the Seattle phone book. I think she said they received something like 10,000 poetry submissions per year.

Yikes!

By the way, if an editor rejects your stuff but says something nice, like "competent" - you might want to send them something else in the future.

No matter the reason, even for the thick-skinned writer, rejection slips hurt.

( Posted by: gomarsoap [Member] On: June 20, 2006 )

eviscerates [empty] promise and potential
windchime,

Thought number two was expedient in its message, for all its abstract and dearth of economic value. Number one would quash me where likely or unlikely disembowled, or out of fairness, empty. Go gorge on grapes for future prospects. No faves to attach alongside as of yet, only my comments to live by.

Schindees,

Would love to see the poem that labelled you politically incorrect and decidely out of tone? The poem you refer to, is it on literature. org? Anyhow, perhaps they had not the imagination or creative fervour to exact or pen a most lugubrious or most supportive excuse!

firstempty 2008

( Posted by: firstedition [Member] On: November 26, 2008 )





Add Your Comment

You Must be a member to post comments and ratings. If you are NOT already a member, signup now it only takes a few seconds!

All Fields are required

Commenting Guidelines:
  • All comments must be about the writing. Non-related comments will be deleted.
  • Flaming, derogatory or messages attacking other members well be deleted.
  • Adult/Sexual comments or messages will be deleted.
  • All subjects MUST be PG. No cursing in subjects.
  • All comments must follow the sites posting guidelines.
The purpose of commenting on Lit.Org is to help writers improve their writing. Please post constructive feedback to help the author improve their work.


Username:
Password:
Subject:
Comment:





Login:
Password: